Criterion: Responsible Sourcing of Minerals

Version 1.0.0 | Status: Active
UN conformity topic code:

Requirements for due diligence on conflict minerals (3TG+C) sourcing

Full Description

E3. Responsible Sourcing of Minerals

Code 8.0

Participants shall adopt a policy and exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of the tantalum, tin, tungsten, gold, and cobalt in the products they manufacture to reasonably assure that they are sourced in a way consistent with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas or an equivalent and recognized due diligence framework.

Elements to Demonstrate Compliance to RBA Code

1. Policy

Ensure company's responsible sourcing and/or conflict minerals policy is in place:

  • a. To reasonably assure the tin, tungsten, tantalum, gold and cobalt (3TG+C) in the products manufactured/sold/provided are sourced in a way consistent with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance or an equivalent and recognized due diligence framework.
  • b. Commit the company to exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of minerals in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance
  • c. Cover all 3TG+C included in the company's products.
  • d. Be communicated to suppliers and the public such as posted to company's public website, contained within a Corporate Responsibility Report, and/or supplier Code of Conduct or other official public company communications.

2. Procedures & Practices

Procedures & Practices to perform due diligence in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance:

  • a. Identify a senior management person responsible for the implementation of the Management System
  • b. Include 3TG+C due diligence sourcing requirements in written agreements and/or contracts with suppliers.
  • c. Understand which parts/materials contain 3TG+C and the chain of custody to determine if they are from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas
  • d. Process and actions taken when suppliers are not in conformance with the Conflict Minerals Policy or a potentially conflict-affected source.
  • e. Proof of implementation (see Records)

NOTE: This can solely be a "Corporate" role without local / facility involvement. You must determine where the responsibilities for conforming to the policy will be located; it may be shared. Then clearly assign those responsibilities. For example, in a company where ALL supplier sourcing and inquiry is done centrally in a corporate group, there may not be local / facility level involvement.

3. Controls & Monitoring

Controls & Monitoring should include:

  • a. Mitigate any risks identified per the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, including suspending, or terminating business relationships with suppliers when risk mitigation fails.
  • b. Review the Management System annually to ensure conformance and improve where process improvements have been identified.

4. Records

Records are maintained including:

  • a. Maintaining records related to 3TG+C due diligence for a minimum of two (2) years.
  • b. Annual review and improvement plan of the policy, process and roles and responsibilities to ensure conformance and improve where process improvements have been identified.
  • c. Mitigation plans with suppliers if any risk is identified including additional actions taken to ensure completion by a specified date if mitigation actions are not on-track.

NOTE: Records then need to be carefully maintained and accessible during a Corporate or facility level assessment. Evidence of the entire effort regardless of where it occurs will be required to be shown in an RBA VAP.

5. Serious conditions that will result in a severe finding

  • There is confirmed purchasing of minerals from conflict sources but there is no action plan in place that is being actively managed.
  • More than 20% of 3TG+C sources do not have a documented due diligence in place
Profiles using this criterion

RBA Assessment Program

Pass Threshold Metrics

Metric: Conflict Sourcing Without Action

Type: Confirmed conflict source, no action plan
Threshold: true → Priority

Metric: Due Diligence Coverage

Type: % 3TG+C without due diligence
Threshold: 20% (>) → Priority

Conformity Alignment

Priority

Pass: No
Definition: "Critical non-conformance requiring immediate action"
Remediation: 30 days

Major

Pass: No
Definition: "Significant non-conformance requiring corrective action"
Remediation: 90 days

Minor

Pass: Yes
Definition: "Non-conformance with limited impact"
Conditions: Corrective action plan required
Remediation: 180 days

Opportunity

Pass: Yes
Definition: "Opportunity for improvement identified"

Conformance

Pass: Yes
Definition: "Full conformance with criterion requirements"

Related Criterion

VAP: Supplier Responsibility

Relationship: Related
Supplier due diligence and monitoring

VAP: Company Commitment

Relationship: Related
Corporate policy on responsible sourcing

VAP: Prohibition of Forced Labor

Relationship: Related
Conflict minerals often linked to forced labor

Change Log

1.0.0 (2024-01-01)

Initial release.