Criterion: Fair Business, Advertising and Competition

Version 2.0.0 | Status: Deprecated
Supersedes: 1.0.0
UN conformity topic code:

Requirements for fair business, advertising, and competition practices

Full Description

D4. Fair Business, Advertising and Competition

Code 8.0

Standards of fair business, advertising, and competition are to be upheld.

Elements to Demonstrate Compliance to RBA Code

1. Controls & Monitoring

D4.1 No identified risk or evidence of non-conformance with fair business, advertising, and competition standards.

Conformance is demonstrated through record review:

  • a. Grievance records (internal and external) do not reveal any allegations of fair business, advertising, or competition.
    • i. Any allegation of fair business, advertising, or competition is investigated, and action is taken if the allegation is substantiated.

2. Audit Method

  • Record Review: Grievance records (internal and external) and related investigation records.
  • Management Interview: Applicable.
  • Worker Interview: Staff who influence purchase decisions.
  • Site Observations: Not applicable.

3. Rating

Priority Major Minor
See finding severity definition See finding severity definition See finding severity definition

Remote Verification Acceptable: Yes

Profiles using this criterion

RBA Assessment Program

Conformity Alignment

Priority

Pass: No
Definition: "Critical non-conformance requiring immediate action"
Remediation: 30 days

Major

Pass: No
Definition: "Significant non-conformance requiring corrective action"
Remediation: 90 days

Minor

Pass: Yes
Definition: "Non-conformance with limited impact"
Conditions: Corrective action plan required
Remediation: 180 days

Opportunity

Pass: Yes
Definition: "Opportunity for improvement identified"

Conformance

Pass: Yes
Definition: "Full conformance with criterion requirements"

Related Criterion

VAP: Business Integrity and No Improper Advantage

Relationship: Related
Business integrity and ethical conduct

VAP: Disclosure of Information

Relationship: Related
Accurate public statements and disclosure

VAP: Ethics Management System

Relationship: Parent
Management system for ethics practices

Change Log

2.0.0 (2022-06-01)

Changed

  • Replaced the policy-adequacy test with a mandatory grievance-records evidence test: The rating determinant changed from a policy-adequacy test (7.0.0 Major = 'No detailed and understandable policy and procedures implemented' for anti-collusion safeguards and monitoring) to a grievance-records evidence test: grievance records (internal and external) must not reveal any allegations of fair business, advertising, or competition, and any such allegation must be investigated with action taken if substantiated. This new mandatory evidentiary condition did not exist in 7.0.0: a facility that passed 7.0.0 on the strength of a detailed anti-collusion policy would FAIL 7.1.2 if its grievance records reveal a substantiated (or un-investigated) allegation — a prior pass can become a fail, hence major. Rating bands were genericised to 'See finding severity definition'. The 7.1.2 and 8.0.0 rule text is audit-equivalent (only preposition, punctuation, and wording differ), so both VAP releases share this version.

1.0.0 (2021-01-01)

Changed

  • Initial historical baseline — Fair Business, Advertising and Competition (RBA Code of Conduct 7.0, provision D5): Earliest imported version of the criterion (published as provision D5 in VAP 7.0.0). Conformance rested on an adequate and effective policy and procedures ensuring fair business, advertising, and competition standards are upheld, including safeguards to prevent collusion with other companies on product pricing or other factors that could reduce competition, and monitoring procedures. Rated purely on documentary policy completeness (Major = 'No detailed and understandable policy and procedures implemented'; Minor = 'Partial policy or procedures or implementation'; Priority = Not Applicable).